Talk:Hungerford massacre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good article nomineeHungerford massacre was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
August 21, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hungerford massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

School shooting[edit]

This qualifies as a school shooting. Ryan shot himself whilst in the school, hence making it a school shooting. I don't see what the difficulty would be in seeing the category's way into the article. - (talk) 17:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for bringing it here to discuss. I don't agree at all. Can I respectfully ask if you have read School shooting or looked at the contents of Category:School shootings committed by adults or Category:School shootings I see no similarity. Yes, Ryan did indeed top himself at a school but his attack was an apparently fairly random ramble round Hungerford. It doesn't seem anything like the others, nor like the definitions given in the article. It was not an attack on a school and its people - it was an attack, surely, on a town? Best wishes DBaK (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Licence vs. license[edit]

Discuss here rather than edit-warring. This is an English article, as such it should adhere to the English (British) standard. Enigmamsg 00:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I agree, and at the moment "licensed" is incorrectly spelt in 2 of its 3 uses in the article - whether we are using British or American English. Although the noun is spelt differently (UK= "a licence", US = "a license") the verb is spelt identically in both varieties of English as "to license". So "Licenced firearms ownership" should be "Licensed firearms ownership" and "he was in licenced possession" should be "he was in licensed possession" to remove the spelling mistakes. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Agreed. The vandal IP who changed it to the wrong spelling is obviously the same IP-hopping sock, evading blocks, as seen at Downloadable content. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps User:Enigmaman can correct it, as he has set full-protection on the article? --David Biddulph (talk) 08:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 Done Enigmamsg 22:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)